foto: TikTok/@lastridyudhevi_93

It is known that Arina reported that Tiko embezzled funds amounting to IDR 6.9 billion. However, Tiko denied this.

  11 Juni 2024 14:32

Brilio.net - Previously, Arina Winarto (AW)'s report regarding the case of embezzlement of funds involving her ex-husband, Tiko Aryawardhana, was immediately responded to. Tiko Aryawardhana, through his attorney, suspects that this report is because Arina has not moved on. It is known that Arina reported that Tiko embezzled funds amounting to IDR 6.9 billion. However, Tiko denied this.

Apart from the accusation of embezzling funds, Arina Winarto does not seem to accept it because there are rumors that she did this because her household affairs were not finished or had not moved on. This objection was conveyed through his attorney, Leo Siregar.

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal loss  TikTok

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal losses
TikTok/@lastridyudhevi_93

Leo Siregar said that the report was submitted purely based on strong evidence and conjecture. This is purely about the cooperation they have built and has nothing to do with Arina and Tiko's past.

"That (allegation) is not true, our report is purely related to the business being run and has nothing to do with household matters, really. There are two initial pieces of evidence, that's why the South Jakarta Police can be investigated," said Leo Siregar, quoted by merdeka6.com on Tuesday (11/6).

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal loss  TikTok

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal losses
TikTok/@lastridyudhevi_93

Before continuing this case to a legal settlement, Arina's party had asked Tiko to explain the alleged embezzlement. However, Tiko never provided clarification with complete data. Because of that, Arina decided to report it to the authorities.

"Our client AW, after officially divorcing in February 2022, has acted in good faith by asking TA for clarification regarding this matter in March 2022. However, TA was unable to provide complete data," added Leo Siregar.

Apart from that, Leo also responded to Tiko's claim that the embezzlement was less than IDR 6.9 billion. He emphasized that the figures mentioned in the report were based on the results of audits carried out by competent independent auditors. Even Leo didn't mind testing the value of the losses his client had experienced.

"This figure is based on the results of an investigative audit conducted by an independent accountant. So if someone says the value is not up to IDR 6.9 billion, go ahead. We just have to test it together," he said.

However, even though there is a nominal difference, until now Leo has not heard any objection from Tiko that he did not embezzle. So his party assumed that Tiko was secretly admitting to this allegation.

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal loss  TikTok

aw's response is said to have not moved on and the difference in nominal losses
TikTok/@lastridyudhevi_93

"But what should be noted, despite all that, to this day, no one has dared to deny that TA did not do what is alleged. So I assume they also secretly admitted it," he continued.

Due to these various polemics, Leo requested that the case receive public supervision. He also asked the public to continue following this case and respect the ongoing legal process. The hope is that the police will immediately provide legal certainty considering that this report has been ongoing for two years.

"Rather than throwing around unclear issues and opinions, it's better for us to oversee this legal process together so that the South Jakarta Police can immediately provide legal certainty. Because it's been two years (the LP)," he concluded.

(brl/ola)

RELATED ARTICLES

TOP